# I Tried EasyGen vs MagicPost: Features, Pricing, Cons, Which Is Better (2026)?

> MagicPost costs half as much, starts free, and has by far the better review record. EasyGen has the sharper trend feed. Both just leave you with AI slop.

**By Aitijya Sarkar** - Published 2026-07-26 - Updated 2026-08-12 - 11 min read

I've spent close to six years ghostwriting LinkedIn content for 50-odd founders, coaches and CXOs — north of 100 million organic views between them — so I've run tools like these across dozens of client accounts. EasyGen and MagicPost both landed on my desk that way.

Between the two, MagicPost is the stronger LinkedIn tool in 2026 for most people. It costs roughly half as much — $29 a month against EasyGen's $59.99 — and it lets you start on a free plan instead of hiding its price behind a login. It didn't break on the way in, and it does more once you're inside: a hooks generator, a scheduling calendar with scheduled comments, an agency approval flow. EasyGen has one real edge — its Track Creators feed surfaces high-performing posts from creators you follow, ranked by how far each post beat that creator's own baseline, which is a sharper discovery surface than MagicPost's paywalled inspirations library. Safety doesn't separate them: both are ToS-safe, generating through a plain web app or LinkedIn's official APIs, with no browser extension hooked into your login. But neither remembers who you are between sessions or looks anything up before drafting, so both slide into the same templated AI slop LinkedIn now penalises. For posts grounded in your own POV and voice, I'd point you at Oiti, the AI clone for LinkedIn content, instead.

## EasyGen vs MagicPost at a Glance

|  | EasyGen | MagicPost | Oiti — AI clone for LinkedIn content (my pick) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Best for | Fast viral-format skeletons off a creator-trend feed, which you'll rewrite yourself | A cheap, free-to-start AI writer with scheduling and an agency approval flow | Anyone who wants posts grounded in their own POV, not templated AI slop |
| Starting price | $59.99/mo - $599.88/yr, login-gated with no public pricing page | $29/mo Starter (list $49), 20 posts - $39/mo Creator, unlimited posts | $49/mo Creator - $79/mo Pro |
| Real price after trial | $59.99 (captured May 2026, from the in-app Upgrade modal) | $29-$39 on the running promo, list $49-$69 (captured May 2026) | $49 / $79 |
| Free trial | 7-day trial, advertised on the homepage; reportedly a few free posts before that | Free plan with a handful of posts, then paid | 7-day, no usage caps |
| LinkedIn's terms of service | Safe — plain web app, no extension | Safe — official API, no extension, LinkedIn-verified partner | Safe — official LinkedIn APIs |
| Standout strength | Track Creators feed with an Outlier Index, and real speed | 4.7/5 across 91 Trustpilot reviews, plus the wider feature set of the two | Long-term memory + Knowledge Base |
| Biggest weakness | Expired broetry output, onboarding broke, premium price for text posts | Form input with no iteration, output reads vanilla, inspirations paywalled | LinkedIn-first; no outbound, no native mobile app |
| Overall winner | — | ✓ (cheaper, broader, better-loved) | — (parallel pick, not the referee) |

Prices captured May 2026 from each vendor. MagicPost takes price, transparency, breadth and reputation. EasyGen wins the discovery-feed row outright, and it's fast.

## How I Tested EasyGen v/s MagicPost - My Testing Methodology

I signed up for both and used them hands-on. EasyGen I tried back in 2025, after Ruben Hassid and Anisha Jain posted about it; MagicPost I got into when it launched, walking the full onboarding and writing through the generator and the editor. I didn't pay for either — both let you generate real posts before they charge you, which was enough to onboard, run a live topic through each, and read what came back.

Here's what I weighed, cost and the writing itself carrying the most. LinkedIn safety isn't weighted heavily here — I'll explain why in its own section, but it's a wash: EasyGen is a plain web app, MagicPost runs official APIs, and neither hooks your login through a browser extension.

1. **Cost & transparency** — The real monthly number, and whether you can even see it before you hand over an email.
2. **The AI writing** — I ran the same live topic through both and read the output line by line.
3. **Onboarding & reliability** — Did the thing let me in and get me to a first draft without falling over.
4. **Features & breadth** — What you get past the generator, and whether the discovery feed is any good.
5. **Reputation** — What real reviewers say, with the sample-size caveats spelled out.

## What is EasyGen — the Tool to Write LinkedIn Posts Like Creators With 100M+ Views?

EasyGen is a LinkedIn-only web app at easygen.io, built by Ruben Hassid, and its homepage sells the pitch in one line: "Write LinkedIn posts like creators with 100M+ views," off "real data from top 1% creators plus trending topic intelligence," with a 10,000+ members claim. When I got in, it was a one-shot form. I typed a topic, got a post, and landed in a My Posts editor with the draft sitting in front of me. The other half of the product is discovery: a Trending feed and a Track Creators list that surfaces high-performing posts from creators you follow, ranked by an Outlier Index. You can schedule from the editor, but the whole thing is built around text posts. No carousels, no real analytics, no browser extension. And the price is login-gated — I couldn't see a number until I was inside.

![EasyGen's homepage: "Write LinkedIn posts like creators with 100M+ views," a subhead about real data from top 1% creators plus trending topic intelligence, "Start 7-day trial" and "Sign up with Google" buttons, "10,000+ people already joined Easygen," and a product mockup showing the left nav: Generate Post, My Posts, Trending, Creators List, Creator engagement, Saved Posts, Calendar.](/comparisons/competitors/easygen/homepage.webp) — EasyGen's homepage — "Write LinkedIn posts like creators with 100M+ views," built on data from top 1% creators, with a "Start 7-day trial" button and a "10,000+ people already joined" line.

## What is MagicPost — Everything You Need to Grow on LinkedIn in One Place?

MagicPost is a LinkedIn writer at magicpost.in, pitching itself as "Everything you need to grow on LinkedIn. In one place," with a LinkedIn-verified-partner badge and a 100k-users line above the fold. Under the marketing it's a form: I picked a post type and a category, typed a subject, and hit "Generate a post." Around that sit a hooks generator, an editor with a live LinkedIn preview, a scheduling calendar with scheduled comments, and an inspirations library walled behind the Creator plan. There's an agency mode too — per-client workspaces and an approval workflow, sold through a contact-sales tier. Aggressive promo pricing, a free plan, no browser extension, no carousel maker.

![MagicPost's homepage: "Everything you need to grow on LinkedIn. In one place," with a "MagicPost is a LinkedIn-verified partner" badge, "Write in your voice, find ideas, schedule, analyze, engage... Not your generic AI," a "Try MagicPost for free" button, and "Join 100k+ users."](/comparisons/competitors/magicpost/homepage.webp) — MagicPost's homepage — "Everything you need to grow on LinkedIn. In one place," a LinkedIn-verified-partner badge, and a "Join 100k+ users" line.

So that's the two of them side by side.

Now to what actually separates them — starting with the one that usually decides it: price.

## 1. EasyGen vs MagicPost Pricing: What's the Best Value for Money?

MagicPost is roughly half the price, and it lets you see the number before you commit. When I looked, Starter was $29 a month against a $49 list price, capped at 20 posts, with a hooks generator, an ideas generator and scheduling included. Creator was $39 against a $69 list price, for unlimited posts plus LinkedIn metrics, the inspirations library and scheduled comments. Both tiers knock off a further 40 percent if you pay annually. Team or Agency is contact-sales. Every one of those numbers sat on a public pricing page with a "Try it for free" button under it.

![MagicPost pricing cards with a Monthly / "40% off annually" toggle: Starter $29 with $49 struck through, 20 posts a month, ideas and hooks generators, scheduling and tagging; Creator $39 with $69 struck through, marked "Most popular," unlimited posts plus metrics, inspirations library, scheduled comments and engagement; and a "Team or Agency — Let's chat" contact-sales card.](/comparisons/competitors/magicpost/pricing.webp) — MagicPost's pricing — Starter $29 (list $49, 20 posts), Creator $39 (list $69, "Most popular," unlimited posts), and a "Team or Agency" contact-sales card; a further 40% off annually.

EasyGen is $59.99 a month, or $599.88 a year, and there's no public pricing page at all. I went to /pricing and it bounced me straight to the sign-in screen. The number only exists inside an "Upgrade to Pro" modal that shows up once you've signed up, onboarded and gone to upgrade. That's roughly double MagicPost's entry price, for a tool built around text posts, and you can't find it out until you've handed over an email.

![EasyGen's in-app "Upgrade to Pro" modal, the only place its price appears: Monthly ($59.99 / month) with a Subscribe button, and Annual ($599.88 / year) with a Subscribe button.](/comparisons/competitors/easygen/easygen-pricing.webp) — EasyGen's in-app "Upgrade to Pro" modal — the only place its price appears: $59.99/month or $599.88/year.

EasyGen's counter is that you can still look before you pay — its homepage leads with a "Start 7-day trial" button, and there are reportedly a few free posts before that.

It doesn't change the shape of it, though: you're weighing a login-gated $59.99 against a published $29 that starts free.

**Winner:** MagicPost, decisively. Either way, you're paying $29 or $59.99 for the same one-shot-form generic, so value here is about which one wastes less of your money.

## 2. EasyGen vs MagicPost Content: Which Tool's AI Writing Is Better in 2026?

Next up, the one that actually matters — which of these writes anything worth posting.

Neither one won this outright. Both draft off a form instead of a conversation, and neither builds a durable model of you that survives the session, so both drift to the same templated middle. What differs is the flavour of generic — and EasyGen's is the exact one LinkedIn actively penalises.

I ran a live topic through EasyGen: AI taking away jobs. What came back was 2020 broetry, verbatim: "AI is taking away jobs. / This change is happening fast. / Many fear losing their work." One flat declarative per line, a numbered "6 ways to prepare for a future with AI" listicle in the middle, a nothing-sentence to close. No argument, no story, nobody specific behind it. That format printed engagement in 2019 and 2020, and LinkedIn's 2026 ranking model — the 360Brew foundation model documented in [LinkedIn's March 2026 engineering blog](https://www.linkedin.com/blog/engineering) — penalises it.

![EasyGen's "My Posts" editor: three draft cards dated Mar 19 2025 (120, 100 and 138 words) on the left, the selected draft rendered in full on the right reading "AI is taking away jobs. / This change is happening fast. / Many fear losing their work..." down through a numbered "Here are 6 ways to prepare for a future with AI," with "0 image credits" and a "Buy Image Credits" button above.](/comparisons/competitors/easygen/product-screenshots/editing-dashboard.webp) — EasyGen's "My Posts" editor — the generated draft in full: "AI is taking away jobs. This change is happening fast..." one flat line at a time, into a numbered "6 ways to prepare for a future with AI."

MagicPost's draft was better, and it was still the same kind of writing.

Its onboarding did pick up small patterns in how I write, which EasyGen never even attempted, and the result read cleaner. It also read like it could have belonged to anyone in my niche — because it had sampled a handful of my recent posts, not the hundreds I've actually published.

Both work the same way underneath. EasyGen: topic in, post out, no chat. MagicPost: post type ("Actionable"), post category ("Explanation / Analysis"), a subject box, tone and emoji parameters, then "Generate a post." Neither lets you say "no, tighter, lose that opening line" and watch the draft change. Your first prompt is the whole conversation, which is a strange thing to design into a writing tool.

![MagicPost's generator: Post type and Post category dropdowns, a Subject box with a sample topic typed in, Tone / Emojis / Expression / Language parameters, collapsed Advanced options for specific instructions and custom hooks, and a "Generate a post" button. No chat surface anywhere.](/comparisons/competitors/magicpost/product-screenshots/generate-post-view.webp) — MagicPost's generator — Post type, Post category, a Subject box and tone/emoji parameters, then "Generate a post." No chat surface to iterate on the draft.

MagicPost's reviewers read this more kindly, and from where they sit they aren't wrong:

> "The tool allows analyzes your own writing so if you've already been posting, it does great to keep *your* personal touch."
> — [Adam Darer, US — Trustpilot, 4/5, Aug 2025](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/magicpost.in)

True up to a point. If you've published fifteen posts, a tool that reads those fifteen posts feels like it captured you. Push a hundred a month through it and the ceiling arrives fast. And a fast broetry skeleton is still worth something if you were always going to rewrite it yourself.

**Winner:** neither — EasyGen's output is the more dated of the two. This is the gap both tools share: they read a handful of your posts once and stop. Oiti builds a 2,000-3,000 word persona off hundreds of them and keeps compounding every edit you make, so the draft stays grounded in your POV instead of the templated middle. [Try Oiti free for 7 days, no usage limits](/) and run the same topic through all three.

## 3. EasyGen vs MagicPost Onboarding & Reliability: Which One Just Works?

Now to the thing that decided it for me faster than any feature list — whether the product even worked on the way in.

MagicPost got me to a first draft without incident. EasyGen broke before I got there.

The screen asks you to share your LinkedIn so it can — in its words — use publicly available profile information to personalize your experience, with a reassurance underneath that "EasyGen will never be connected to your LinkedIn, whatsoever." I typed my name and profile URL, hit Continue, and got a red toast: "Setup failed: Unexpected end of JSON input." Three or four retries before it let me through.

![EasyGen's "Share your LinkedIn" onboarding step (Profile / Followers / Subscribe), first and last name filled in, LinkedIn profile URL entered, and an error toast in the corner reading "Setup failed: Unexpected end of JSON input."](/comparisons/competitors/easygen/product-screenshots/onboarding-bug-setup.webp) — EasyGen's "Share your LinkedIn" onboarding step — an error toast in the corner: "Setup failed: Unexpected end of JSON input."

A JSON parse error on the screen where you hand over your profile, on a tool you're weighing at $59.99 a month, isn't a nitpick. It's the first thing the product does in front of you, and it's the kind of failure you fix before you charge people. When the writing lands in roughly the same place either way, one of them working on the way in is a real reason to pick it.

**Winner:** MagicPost.

## 4. EasyGen vs MagicPost Features & Breadth: Which One Does More?

That covers getting in. What about once you're actually inside — which one gives you more?

MagicPost is the broader product. Past generation there's a hooks generator, a scheduling calendar with scheduled comments, multi-language drafts, an agency mode with per-client workspaces and an approval workflow, and an editor that renders your draft as a LinkedIn post while you type. That preview is cleanly built, though it doesn't show the full post — and every serious tool in this category ships one now, so it's table stakes, not a reason to buy. EasyGen is narrower by design: text posts, a My Posts library, a calendar, and its discovery feed.

Where EasyGen earns its keep is discovery. You build a Creators List, and it surfaces those creators' outlier posts ranked by how far each one beat their own baseline. Clicking into Anisha Jain gave me posts flagged 12.86x and 12.39x against her own average. That's a better signal than a generic viral library, and it's the one place EasyGen made me stop and think.

![EasyGen's "Your Creators List": cards for Ruben Hassid, Pete Sena, Anisha Jain, Axelle Malek, Akiva Levin, Adam Broda, Lukas Stangl and Jennifer Welsh, each with a headline, location, industry and an "Add to List" button.](/comparisons/competitors/easygen/product-screenshots/tracked-creators-list.webp) — EasyGen's "Your Creators List" — you build a list of creators and it surfaces their outlier posts ranked against each one's own baseline.

MagicPost's answer to the same job is its inspirations library, and on the free plan you can't reach it.

Clicking Inspirations dropped a "CREATOR PLAN REQUIRED — Unlock inspirations" modal over 155,166 results, behind a "See the plans" button. The feature that would help you most on day one is the one you have to upgrade to see.

![MagicPost's Inspirations tab with a "CREATOR PLAN REQUIRED" modal over the feed: "Unlock inspirations — access thousands of high-performing LinkedIn posts," search, advanced filters and "adapt any post to your style," with a "See the plans" button. The sidebar shows 3 remaining posts on a free plan.](/comparisons/competitors/magicpost/product-screenshots/immediate-paywall.webp) — MagicPost's Inspirations tab — a "CREATOR PLAN REQUIRED" modal walls off 155,166 posts on the free plan, behind "See the plans."

The catch cuts both ways: each stops at the feed. EasyGen shows you the viral post and leaves you to reverse-engineer it by eye, which for most people means copying the shape and shipping more broetry. Neither turns a post that worked into a reusable structural template, filled by something that already knows your POV. That last step — viral post to one-click template grounded in your own writing — is exactly what Oiti's Knowledge Base does.

EasyGen is fast, which isn't the same as good. The one positive review on its Trustpilot profile is about exactly that:

> "I was able to create LinkedIn posts quickly and maintain a content calendar in minutes. Also, it created images for my..."
> — Nerdy Dad, US — Trustpilot, 5/5, Mar 2025

**Winner:** MagicPost on breadth, EasyGen on the discovery feed.

## 5. EasyGen vs MagicPost and LinkedIn's Terms of Service: Which Is Safe?

Before the reputation call, the question people ask most about any LinkedIn tool: is it going to get my account flagged?

Both are safe, and this is the rare comparison where account safety decides nothing. EasyGen is a plain web app that generates text — no Chrome extension in my testing, nothing scraping or automating your account, and its own onboarding states it will never be connected to your LinkedIn. MagicPost publishes through LinkedIn's official APIs, carries a LinkedIn-verified-partner badge, and likewise ships no browser extension hooking your session cookies.

That matters because the tools that actually get accounts flagged are the ones running automation off your LinkedIn cookies through a browser extension — mass auto-comments, auto-connects, scraping. Neither of these does that. So the usual tiebreaker in a LinkedIn tool comparison is a non-factor here: pick on price, features and output instead.

**Winner:** a tie — both are ToS-safe.

## 6. EasyGen vs MagicPost Reputation: Which Tool Is Better-Loved?

Both clear the safety bar. So the last real separator is how people who actually paid feel about each one.

MagicPost holds 4.7 out of 5 across 91 Trustpilot reviews on a claimed profile, with nothing below a 4 in the sample I pulled — the strongest showing of any LinkedIn-only tool I've tracked. EasyGen's footprint is three Trustpilot reviews, a 3.0 TrustScore, two of them one star.

![A MagicPost Trustpilot review: Adam Darer, Aug 30 2025, 4 out of 5 stars, on how the tool analyzes your own writing to keep your personal touch.](/comparisons/competitors/magicpost/reviews/trustpilot-adam.webp) — Adam Darer on Trustpilot — 4/5, Aug 2025.

The sharpest of EasyGen's negatives says roughly what I found:

> "I didn't find it useful — maybe it is in the future, but not worth the money today."
> — Felix Hofmann, Switzerland — Trustpilot, 1/5, Aug 2025

**Winner:** MagicPost, clearly.

## Which Should You Pick — EasyGen or MagicPost?

**Pick MagicPost if** you want to spend less and start free. Half the monthly bill, a published price, a free plan you can write a few posts on, a product that does more once you're in it, and a public track record EasyGen doesn't have. If you aren't sure, buy this one.

**Pick MagicPost if** you run an agency and sign-off is your bottleneck. Per-client workspaces with isolated settings and an approval workflow are rare in LinkedIn-only tools this size, and EasyGen has nothing like it — it's built for one person writing their own posts. (If getting each client's posts grounded in that client's own POV is the actual job, Oiti Pro at $79 keeps a separate AI Clone per workspace, worth testing in parallel.)

**Pick EasyGen if** the Track Creators feed is specifically what you want — a fast read on what's beating each creator's own baseline right now — and you're fine paying the premium, doing the editing yourself, and living with a one-shot form.

**Pick neither if** what you want is posts that stay specific to your world and read like a human with a point of view wrote them. Both draft off a form, neither remembers anything, and paying more doesn't fix it.

## When Neither EasyGen nor MagicPost Is the Answer: Try Oiti, the AI Clone for LinkedIn Content

Neither tool remembers who you are between sessions, and neither looks anything up before drafting. Both fall back on templated formats, so the output reads generic whichever one you buy. EasyGen's form gave me expired broetry; MagicPost's produced something cleaner and just as anonymous. Different UI, same one-shot form underneath — same AI slop out the other end.

That's the gap Oiti, the [AI clone for LinkedIn content](/use-cases/ai-ghostwriter-for-linkedin), closes. Every time you write, Oiti fires parallel fetches across your long-term memory and your Knowledge Base, working out who you are, what you believe and how you actually write before a word hits the page.

![Oiti's chat on the left interviewing the author for their real story before writing, with the finished LinkedIn draft shown on the right.](/comparisons/competitors/oiti/product-screenshots/content-creation-flow.webp) — Oiti drafting a post in chat — it asks for your real story first, then writes it the way you actually talk.

The long-term memory absorbs every correction you make, so "don't open with 'I'" and "stop using the word unlock" stick and apply to the next draft instead of evaporating when you close the tab.

The Knowledge Base ingests your past posts, your PDFs, your YouTube videos and your meeting notes, and researches what your ICP is complaining about on the live web right now.

![Oiti's Knowledge Base — a searchable table of 22 saved LinkedIn sources marked "Ready," with "Sync LinkedIn Posts" and "Add Material" buttons, under the line "Everything added here will be used as reference material by Oiti to ideate and create content."](/comparisons/competitors/oiti/product-screenshots/knowledge-base.webp) — Oiti's Knowledge Base — your posts, PDFs and videos become reference material it pulls before it drafts.

![An Oiti-written draft grounded in live web research — sections on prices, affordability, first-time buyers, mortgage rates and inventory, each statistic underlined with an inline source chip (realtor.com, redfin.com, nahb.org, prnewswire.com).](/comparisons/competitors/oiti/product-screenshots/inline-citations.webp) — Grounded drafts, not guesses — each stat in an Oiti draft carries an inline source.

And because it's a chat composer, you get the back-and-forth neither of these forms allows: you say "no, not like that," and it rewrites. Scheduling and analytics run on LinkedIn's official APIs, so you're on the same safe footing as both of these — no extension, no cookie automation.

![Oiti's Analytics dashboard — total impressions 484K, reach 109K, and 15.4K followers, with posts published, net followers gained, and average engagement rate charted over twelve months.](/comparisons/competitors/oiti/product-screenshots/analytics-dashboard.webp) — Oiti reports on LinkedIn's official API — performance over time and your best posts, no extension.

![Oiti's Calendar in month view (May 2026, 8 events) with scheduled posts sitting on several days and a persona / status filter bar above the grid.](/comparisons/competitors/oiti/product-screenshots/full-feature-scheduling-calendar.webp) — Oiti's Calendar — schedule across profiles on LinkedIn's official API, the same safe rails both of these run on.

If you want a cheap, free-to-start LinkedIn writer and don't much care whether a specific person shows through, MagicPost is fine and Oiti is overkill. If you specifically want EasyGen's creator-trend feed and were always going to rewrite the drafts yourself, that's a real reason to stay. But if your edge is that your writing reads like a real human with a point of view, that's the one thing neither of these protects.

You can settle it yourself in a week. [Try Oiti free for 7 days, no usage limits](/), run your next post through it, and read what comes back against what these two gave you.

## FAQ

### Is MagicPost cheaper than EasyGen?

Yes, by a wide margin. MagicPost's Starter is $29 a month against a $49 list price for 20 posts, Creator is $39 for unlimited posts, and there's a free plan you can start writing on. EasyGen is $59.99 a month, or $599.88 a year — roughly double at entry. It also has no public pricing page: /pricing redirects to sign-in, and the number only shows in an "Upgrade to Pro" modal once you're inside the app. So MagicPost is cheaper to run, and it's the only one of the two whose price you can read before you commit.

### Is EasyGen or MagicPost safer for my LinkedIn account?

Neither is riskier than the other. EasyGen is a plain web app that generates text — in my testing there was no Chrome extension and nothing that scrapes or automates your account, and its own onboarding says it'll never be connected to your LinkedIn. MagicPost publishes through LinkedIn's official APIs, carries a LinkedIn-verified-partner badge, and likewise ships no browser extension hooking your session cookies. Neither carries the account risk that comes from extension-driven automation, which is where accounts actually get in trouble. Safety usually decides these comparisons; here it decides nothing. Pick on price, features and output instead.

### Does EasyGen or MagicPost have a free trial?

Both let you look before you pay, differently. MagicPost has a free plan rather than a trial clock — my account sat on it with three posts remaining and one of three free hook generations used — so you can write a few posts with no countdown running. EasyGen runs a 7-day free trial, advertised with a "Start 7-day trial" button on its homepage, plus reportedly a few free posts before that. The difference is what you can see: MagicPost shows you its full pricing while you're on the free plan, whereas EasyGen lets you trial the product without showing you the price until you go to upgrade. MagicPost is the easier no-commitment start.

### Does EasyGen or MagicPost's AI actually sound like me?

Not really — and they fail differently. EasyGen returned expired broetry when I tested it on a live topic — "AI is taking away jobs. This change is happening fast." one flat line at a time — the exact format LinkedIn's 2026 ranking model penalises. MagicPost read cleaner and picked up small patterns from my recent posts, but it had sampled a handful of them, not the hundreds I've published, so the draft still read like it could belong to anyone in my niche. Both generate from a one-shot form with no way to iterate mid-draft. Getting a draft grounded in your actual POV needs a tool that keeps reading you after the first session — long-term memory plus a Knowledge Base, [which is how Oiti works](/).

### Is there a better alternative to both EasyGen and MagicPost?

For the core jobs, pick between them: MagicPost for a cheaper, free-to-start writer with a much stronger review record, EasyGen for its creator-trend feed if you'll rewrite everything yourself. But they share one ceiling — the output goes generic, because neither remembers who you are between sessions and neither researches anything before drafting off a form. [Oiti closes that](/) with long-term memory that compounds every edit you make, plus a Knowledge Base that grounds each draft in your own posts, PDFs and videos, and in live research into what your audience is actually complaining about. It's $49 a month on Creator or $79 on Pro, with a 7-day free trial.

### Is EasyGen or MagicPost better for agencies managing multiple clients?

MagicPost, clearly. It ships an agency mode with per-client workspaces, isolated settings and an approval workflow, plus multi-account management, all on a contact-sales tier. EasyGen has no equivalent — it's built for one person writing their own posts, so running several clients means several logins at $59.99 each. What neither does is get each client's posts grounded in that client's own POV: MagicPost reads a handful of recent posts and stops, EasyGen doesn't try at all. That's what per-workspace long-term memory and a Knowledge Base are for, with a separate AI Clone per client on [Oiti's $79 Pro plan](/).

## The verdict

MagicPost is the stronger tool of the two. It's about half the price, its pricing is public where EasyGen's sits behind a login, and it didn't break on the way in. It does more once you're inside — hooks, scheduling with scheduled comments, an agency approval flow — and it holds 4.7 out of 5 on Trustpilot against EasyGen's 3.0. EasyGen's two edges are its Track Creators feed and raw speed. Since both are extension-free and ToS-safe, you aren't trading account risk either way.

So: if you want a cheaper, broader, free-to-start LinkedIn writer, which is most people, MagicPost. If you specifically want EasyGen's creator-trend feed and you'll heavily rewrite the drafts yourself, EasyGen.

But if what you want is posts grounded in your own POV — remembered and researched rather than generic by default — that's the gap Oiti, the AI clone for LinkedIn content, was built for. The AI Clone builds in about 30 seconds, and you can write the same post in all three before you decide.

**Get started**: [Try Oiti free](/) - [See how it works](/)

## Keep reading

- **Review — [My honest EasyGen review](/comparisons/easygen-review)**: The $59.99 broetry machine, end to end.
- **Review — [My honest MagicPost review](/comparisons/magicpost-review)**: Pricing, output, and the paywalled inspirations library.
- **Alternatives — [The best EasyGen alternatives in 2026](/comparisons/easygen-alternatives)**: Every serious replacement, tested hands-on.
- **Alternatives — [The best MagicPost alternatives in 2026](/comparisons/magicpost-alternatives)**: Where MagicPost users go next, and why.
- **Category — [The best LinkedIn AI tools in 2026](/comparisons/best-linkedin-ai-tools-2026)**: The full ranking this page corroborates.